Klinikum Bielefeld gem. GmbH, Standort Halle/Westfalen

Quality results

Treatment sector: Pacemaker: First use (HSMDEF-HSM-IMPL) Explanation

Designation	Herzschrittmacher-Implantation
Shortcut	09/1
Number of cases	194
Documentation rate	100 %
Hospital comment	Die Dokumentationsrate wurde krankenhausbezogen berechnet.

Summary result:

In one of the 1 quality characteristics, the quality objective was achieved.
No assessment is possible for any quality characteristic

Number of patients treated: 194

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Hide national result

Quality criterion

Hospital result
and target area

Quality objective
achieved?

All information

Duration of the operation (based on operations where a pacemaker was inserted for the first time or the housing of the pacemaker was replaced)

National result: 88,55 %
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at least 60,00 %

Quality objective achieved

Click here

Code ID	52139
Result (%)	Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population	Data protection
Events observed	Data protection
Anticipated events	Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
Comparison with the previous reporting year	eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)	88,55
Target range (reference range)	>= 60,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	88,34 - 88,76
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.