Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of female patients in whom at least one of the surrounding organs was injured during an operation on the female reproductive organs (individual risks of the patients were taken into account). The operation was performed by means of laparoscopy
Both ovaries were removed in patients aged 45 years and younger who underwent surgery on the ovaries and/or fallopian tubes. However, the tissue examination after the operation showed no pathological or a benign result
Both ovaries were removed in patients who were 46 to 55 years old who underwent surgery on the ovaries and/or fallopian tubes. However, the tissue examination after the operation showed no pathological or a benign result
The ovaries were not removed during surgery in patients 45 years of age and younger. The tissue examination after the operation showed no pathological or a benign result
Although the result is not in the target area, the quality target is still considered to have been achieved. For more information, see "All information (click here)".
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of female patients in whom at least one of the surrounding organs was injured during an operation on the female reproductive organs (individual risks of the patients were taken into account). The operation was performed by means of laparoscopy
Code ID
51906
Result
0,81
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result
1,05
Target range (reference range)
<= 4,18
Confidence interval nationwide
0,99 - 1,11
Hospital confidence interval
0,22 - 2,91
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS, QS-Planung
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This indicator is a planning-relevant quality indicator. Locations where there is a statistical abnormality are requested by the IQTIG to submit a statement. The purpose of this opinion process is to clarify whether there are reasons that suggest that, despite statistical abnormalities in the quality results, there is no insufficient quality. The quality is assessed as part of the subsequent technical clarification with the support of specialist commissions from the IQTIG. The results of this indicator and the evaluation of the quality are forwarded to the state authorities responsible for hospital planning, to the state associations of health insurance companies and to the replacement funds. Further information on the planning-relevant quality indicators can be found under the following link: https://www.iqtig.org/qs-instrument/planungsrelevante-qualitaetsindikatoren/. This indicator is a risk-adjusted indicator. A risk adjustment compensates for the different composition of the patient groups from different institutions. This leads to a fairer comparison, since there are patient-related risk factors (such as comorbidities) that systematically influence the indicator result without an institution being responsible for e.g. the following more frequent complications can be attributed. For example, the indicator result of a facility with many high-risk cases can be compared more statistically with the result of a facility with many low-risk cases. The risk factors are compiled from patient characteristics that were classified as risk-relevant as part of the development of quality indicators and which can be practically documented. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially noticeable in terms of calculation, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. Due to adjustments to the QS filter, the results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
After surgery on one of the two ovaries, no examination of the removed tissue was performed
Code ID
12874
Result (%)
0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
50
Events observed
0
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
0,95
Target range (reference range)
<= 5,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
0,85 - 1,05
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 7,13
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS, QS-Planung
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This indicator is a planning-relevant quality indicator. Locations where there is a statistical abnormality are requested by the IQTIG to submit a statement. The purpose of this opinion process is to clarify whether there are reasons that suggest that, despite statistical abnormalities in the quality results, there is no insufficient quality. The quality is assessed as part of the subsequent technical clarification with the support of specialist commissions from the IQTIG. The results of this indicator and the evaluation of the quality are forwarded to the state authorities responsible for hospital planning, to the state associations of health insurance companies and to the replacement funds. Further information on the planning-relevant quality indicators can be found under the following link: https://www.iqtig.org/qs-instrument/planungsrelevante-qualitaetsindikatoren/. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially noticeable in terms of calculation, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. Due to adjustments to the QS filter, the results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
One of the two ovaries or fallopian tubes was removed. However, the tissue examination after the operation showed no pathological result
Code ID
10211
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
7,61
Target range (reference range)
<= 20,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
7,20 - 8,05
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS, QS-Planung
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This indicator is a planning-relevant quality indicator. Locations where there is a statistical abnormality are requested by the IQTIG to submit a statement. The purpose of this opinion process is to clarify whether there are reasons that suggest that, despite statistical abnormalities in the quality results, there is no insufficient quality. The quality is assessed as part of the subsequent technical clarification with the support of specialist commissions from the IQTIG. The results of this indicator and the evaluation of the quality are forwarded to the state authorities responsible for hospital planning, to the state associations of health insurance companies and to the replacement funds. Further information on the planning-relevant quality indicators can be found under the following link: https://www.iqtig.org/qs-instrument/planungsrelevante-qualitaetsindikatoren/. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially noticeable in terms of calculation, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. Due to adjustments to the QS filter, the results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
One of the two ovaries or fallopian tubes was removed in patients who were 45 years old and younger. However, the tissue examination after the operation did not show any pathological result
Code ID
172000_10211
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
11,16
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
9,90 - 12,55
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
EKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
10211
Sorting
1
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
One of the two ovaries or fallopian tubes was removed in patients who were 46 to 55 years old. However, the tissue examination after the operation did not show any pathological result
Code ID
172001_10211
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
13,49
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
12,39 - 14,67
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
EKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
10211
Sorting
2
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Both ovaries were removed in patients aged 45 years and younger who underwent surgery on the ovaries and/or fallopian tubes. However, the tissue examination after the operation showed no pathological or a benign result
Code ID
60685
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Although the result is not in the target area, the quality target is still considered to be achieved, because the deviation can be traced back to one or more well-founded individual cases after examination by specialist committees. (U62)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
0,74
Target range (reference range)
Sentinel Event
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
0,66 - 0,83
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially noticeable in terms of calculation, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. Due to adjustments to the QS filter, the results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
Both ovaries were removed in patients who were 46 to 55 years old who underwent surgery on the ovaries and/or fallopian tubes. However, the tissue examination after the operation showed no pathological or a benign result
Code ID
60686
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
19,31
Target range (reference range)
<= 42,35 % (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
18,56 - 20,07
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This indicator is a planning-relevant quality indicator. Locations where there is a statistical abnormality are requested by the IQTIG to submit a statement. The purpose of this opinion process is to clarify whether there are reasons that suggest that, despite statistical abnormalities in the quality results, there is no insufficient quality. The quality is assessed as part of the subsequent technical clarification with the support of specialist commissions from the IQTIG. The results of this indicator and the evaluation of the quality are forwarded to the state authorities responsible for hospital planning, to the state associations of health insurance companies and to the replacement funds. Further information on the planning-relevant quality indicators can be found under the following link: https://www.iqtig.org/qs-instrument/planungsrelevante-qualitaetsindikatoren/. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially noticeable in terms of calculation, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. Due to adjustments to the QS filter, the results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
The ovaries were not removed during surgery in patients 45 years of age and younger. The tissue examination after the operation showed no pathological or a benign result
Code ID
612
Result (%)
80,39
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
51
Events observed
41
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
88,74
Target range (reference range)
>= 74,46 % (5. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
88,41 - 89,07
Hospital confidence interval (%)
67,54 - 88,98
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially noticeable in terms of calculation, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. Due to adjustments to the QS filter, the results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
Patients had a bladder catheter for more than 24 hours
Code ID
52283
Result (%)
10,08
Evaluation through structured dialogue
An evaluation is not possible. For more information, see All information (click here) at the bottom under Comment or Technical note. (S99)
Population
129
Events observed
13
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
3,15
Target range (reference range)
<= 6,59 % (90. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
3,05 - 3,27
Hospital confidence interval (%)
5,98 - 16,48
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Nach Sichtung des klinischen Hintergrunds ist die Einleitung eines Stellungnahmeverfahrens nicht sinnvoll.
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially noticeable in terms of calculation, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. Due to adjustments to the QS filter, the results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.