Although the result is not in the target area, the quality target is still considered to have been achieved. For more information, see "All information (click here)".
Ratio of actual to expected rate of patients dying in hospital after artificial heart implantation
Code ID
251800
Result
1,31
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
12
Events observed
5
Anticipated events
3,82
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result
0,80
Target range (reference range)
<= 1,36
Confidence interval nationwide
0,69 - 0,93
Hospital confidence interval
0,61 - 2,14
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Risk adjustment aims to compensate for the different patient structure in different facilities. Ideally, this leads to a fair comparison of the different facilities, since patients have individual risk factors (such as concomitant diseases) that systematically influence the quality outcome, without it being possible to attribute responsibility for e.g. resulting more frequent complications to one facility. With the help of risk adjustment, the quality outcome of, for example, an institution with many high-risk cases can be statistically compared more fairly with the quality outcome of an institution with many low-risk cases. More information on risk adjustment can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen. The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered suspicious. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
This is how low the risk was for patients to die after implantation of an artificial heart
Code ID
251801
Result (%)
31,87
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
12
Events observed
0
Anticipated events
3,82
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
25,26
Target range (reference range)
<= 35,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
24,54 - 26,52
Hospital confidence interval (%)
23,06 - 43,24
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
The function of the brain was permanently impaired after the insertion of a system that supports the left ventricle
Code ID
52385
Result (%)
0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
12
Events observed
0
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
5,35
Target range (reference range)
<= 20,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
3,85 - 7,38
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 24,25
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. The results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule of the indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
The function of the brain was permanently impaired after the insertion of a system that supports the left and right ventricles
Code ID
52386
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
13,64
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
4,75 - 33,33
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
TKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This is a transparency measure. Transparency indicators do not meet the formal criteria of a quality indicator because they have no reference area and therefore do not trigger a structured dialogue. The results are independent and are not directly linked to a quality indicator. However, transparency indicators indicate essential quality aspects of the supply process and thus increase transparency and the information content. More information on the key figure concept can be found in the following link: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3380/2018-06-21_Qb-R_Freigabe-IQTIG-Bericht_Kennzahlen_inkl-Anlagen.pdf. It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The results of this transparency indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule for the transparency indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the respective transparency key figure at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
The function of the brain was permanently impaired after the insertion of an artificial heart to replace the entire heart
Code ID
52387
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
20,00
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
3,62 - 62,45
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
TKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This is a transparency measure. Transparency indicators do not meet the formal criteria of a quality indicator because they have no reference area and therefore do not trigger a structured dialogue. The results are independent and are not directly linked to a quality indicator. However, transparency indicators indicate essential quality aspects of the supply process and thus increase transparency and the information content. More information on the key figure concept can be found in the following link: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3380/2018-06-21_Qb-R_Freigabe-IQTIG-Bericht_Kennzahlen_inkl-Anlagen.pdf. It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The results of this transparency indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule for the transparency indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the respective transparency key figure at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
Blood poisoning after surgery for the insertion of a system supporting the left ventricle
Code ID
52388
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
7,23
Target range (reference range)
<= 20,73 % (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
5,47 - 9,51
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. The results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule of the indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
Blood poisoning after surgery for the insertion of a system supporting the left and right ventricles
Code ID
52389
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
18,18
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
7,31 - 38,52
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
TKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This is a transparency measure. Transparency indicators do not meet the formal criteria of a quality indicator because they have no reference area and therefore do not trigger a structured dialogue. The results are independent and are not directly linked to a quality indicator. However, transparency indicators indicate essential quality aspects of the supply process and thus increase transparency and the information content. More information on the key figure concept can be found in the following link: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3380/2018-06-21_Qb-R_Freigabe-IQTIG-Bericht_Kennzahlen_inkl-Anlagen.pdf. It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The results of this transparency indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule for the transparency indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the respective transparency key figure at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
Blood poisoning after surgery for the insertion of an artificial heart replacing the entire heart
Code ID
52390
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
20,00
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
3,62 - 62,45
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
TKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This is a transparency measure. Transparency indicators do not meet the formal criteria of a quality indicator because they have no reference area and therefore do not trigger a structured dialogue. The results are independent and are not directly linked to a quality indicator. However, transparency indicators indicate essential quality aspects of the supply process and thus increase transparency and the information content. More information on the key figure concept can be found in the following link: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3380/2018-06-21_Qb-R_Freigabe-IQTIG-Bericht_Kennzahlen_inkl-Anlagen.pdf. It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The results of this transparency indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule for the transparency indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the respective transparency key figure at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
The performance of the system used to support the left ventricle was deficient
Code ID
52391
Result (%)
0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
12
Events observed
0
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
0,16
Target range (reference range)
<= 5,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
0,03 - 0,89
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 24,25
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. The results of this quality indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule of the indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the quality indicators at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
The performance of the system used to support the left and right ventricle was deficient
Code ID
52392
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
4,55
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
0,81 - 21,80
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
TKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This is a transparency measure. Transparency indicators do not meet the formal criteria of a quality indicator because they have no reference area and therefore do not trigger a structured dialogue. The results are independent and are not directly linked to a quality indicator. However, transparency indicators indicate essential quality aspects of the supply process and thus increase transparency and the information content. More information on the key figure concept can be found in the following link: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3380/2018-06-21_Qb-R_Freigabe-IQTIG-Bericht_Kennzahlen_inkl-Anlagen.pdf. It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The results of this transparency indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule for the transparency indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the respective transparency key figure at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.
The performance of the inserted artificial heart to replace the entire heart was deficient
Code ID
52393
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
National result (%)
0,00
Target range (reference range)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
0,00 - 43,45
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
TKez
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
This is a transparency measure. Transparency indicators do not meet the formal criteria of a quality indicator because they have no reference area and therefore do not trigger a structured dialogue. The results are independent and are not directly linked to a quality indicator. However, transparency indicators indicate essential quality aspects of the supply process and thus increase transparency and the information content. More information on the key figure concept can be found in the following link: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3380/2018-06-21_Qb-R_Freigabe-IQTIG-Bericht_Kennzahlen_inkl-Anlagen.pdf. It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The results of this transparency indicator can only be compared to the previous year's results to a limited extent due to adjustments to the calculation rule for the transparency indicator. Further information on the adjustments made can be found in the description of the respective transparency key figure at the following link: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/.