Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift GmbH

Quality results

Treatment sector: Defibrillator (shock generator) for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias: first implantation (HSMDEF-DEFI-IMPL)

Designation Implantierbare Defibrillatoren - Implantation
Shortcut 09/4
Number of cases 28
Documentation rate 100 %

Summary result:

In 6 of 7 quality characteristics, the quality objective was achieved.
For 2 quality characteristics, no assessment is possible.


Number of patients treated: 28

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Quality criterion
Hospital result
and target area
Quality objective
achieved?
All information
The shock generator (defibrillator system) was selected on the basis of recognised scientific recommendations
Hospital: 96,43 %
Target area: at least 90,00 %
Quality objective achieved
Duration of the operation during which the shock generator (defibrillator) is first used or the housing is replaced
Hospital: 93,22 %
Target area: at least 60,00 %
Quality objective achieved
Ratio of actual to expected number of patients in whom the scientifically recommended maximum radiation exposure was exceeded when a defibrillator was inserted for the first time.
Hospital: 3,33
Target area: at most 2,35
Quality objective not achieved
Various measurements during the operation showed that the shock generator?s (defibrillator?s) wiring was functioning properly
Hospital: 91,89 %
Target area: at least 90,00 %
Quality objective achieved
This is how rarely complications occurred during initial defibrillator insertion (other than probe malfunction or displacement: including wound infections)
Hospital: 0,00 %
Target area: at most 2,50 %
Quality objective achieved
This is how rarely displacements or malfunctions of probes occurred during or after insertion of the defibrillator
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at most 3,00 %
Assessment not possible
This is how often the probes were advanced through the subclavian vein to the heart when a defibrillator was first inserted
Hospital: 37,04 %
as often as possible
Evaluation is not available
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of patients who died during their hospital stay (the individual risks of the patients were taken into account)
Hospital: 0,00
Target area: at most 6,48
Quality objective achieved
Ratio of actual to expected number of patients who experienced tube or pouch problems related to the insertion of a shock generator and resulted in a repeat surgery within one year.
Hospital: 3,74
Target area: at most 2,65
Assessment not possible
Ratio of actual to expected number of patients who had infections or perforations of the casing through the skin associated with the insertion of a shock generator, leading to a repeat operation within one year.
Hospital: 0,00
Target area: at most 5,03
Quality objective achieved