Although the result is not in the target area, the quality target is still considered to have been achieved. For more information, see "All information (click here)".
This is how rarely patients die in hospital during or after transplantation
Code ID
572036
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
An evaluation is not possible because there were no patients in the hospital to whom this quality criterion could be applied. (N01)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
4,76
Target range (reference range)
<= 5,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
2,05 - 10,67
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So often the transplanted organ was functioning well enough at discharge that the patients no longer needed insulin.
Code ID
572043
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
An evaluation is not possible because there were no patients in the hospital to whom this quality criterion could be applied. (N01)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
80,00
Target range (reference range)
>= 75,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
71,12 - 86,66
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely did the transplanted organ have to be removed again due to complications
Code ID
572047
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
An evaluation is not possible because there were no patients in the hospital to whom this quality criterion could be applied. (N01)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
20,95
Target range (reference range)
<= 20,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
14,26 - 29,69
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Although indicators represent quality, their results do not allow a direct assessment of the quality of care (due to the lack of a reference range) and they are not suitable for direct quality comparisons (due to the lack of mathematical adjustment). However, they are usually published in direct connection with a quality indicator, the results of which are supplemented by the indicator values (imputed and supplementary indicators). They thus contribute to an increase in the comprehensibility of the quality results. The transparency indicators, which are to be distinguished from these, represent aspects of care for which there are no quality indicators, but which are nevertheless important for presenting the quality of care. More detailed information on ratios can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/veroeffentlichungen/kennzahlenkonzept.