Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR)

Quality results

Treatment sector: Living kidney donation (TX-NLS) Explanation

Information about this treatment area (documentation)

Designation	Nierenlebendspende
Shortcut	NLS
Number of cases	19
Documentation rate	105.26 %
Hospital comment	Die Dokumentationsrate wurde krankenhausbezogen berechnet.

Summary result:

In 3 of 3 quality characteristics, the quality objective was achieved.
No assessment is possible for any quality characteristic

Number of patients treated: 19

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Hide national result

Quality criterion

Hospital result
and target area

Quality objective
achieved?

All information

This is how rarely organ donors die during their hospital stay

National result: 0,00 %
Hospital: 0,00 %

Sentinel Event

Quality objective achieved

Click here

This is how rarely regular dialysis was required for the donor

National result: 0,00 %
Hospital: 0,00 %

Sentinel Event

Quality objective achieved

Click here

This is how rarely complications occurred during or after the operation

National result: 1,69 %
Hospital: 0,00 %

Target area: at most 10,00 %

Quality objective achieved

Click here

Code ID	2137
Result (%)	0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population	20
Events observed	0
Anticipated events	0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	unverändert
National result (%)	0,00
Target range (reference range)	Sentinel Event
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	0,00 - 0,71
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 16,11
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DEQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.

Code ID	2138
Result (%)	0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population	20
Events observed	0
Anticipated events	0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	unverändert
National result (%)	0,00
Target range (reference range)	Sentinel Event
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	0,00 - 0,71
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 16,11
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DEQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.

Code ID	51567
Result (%)	0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population	20
Events observed	0
Anticipated events	0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	unverändert
National result (%)	1,69
Target range (reference range)	<= 10,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	0,89 - 3,17
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 16,11
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DEQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.